← Lab
batchscale
null resultPython · llama.cppInference & servingJuly 5, 2026
the question
Does a real llama-server's throughput scale smoothly with concurrency?
what came out
No -- it's non-monotone with a regime change. Throughput plateaus ~220 tok/s through concurrency 8, then jumps to 522 at 16. Concurrency 8, a partial batch, is the worst place to operate: mediocre throughput and the highest latency.
method & receipts
- Result: null result — an honest negative, reported as it came out.
- Reproducible — one script re-runs the whole thing from scratch.
- Machine-readable claims — every reported number, in a checkable file.
- Tested — a correctness/benchmark suite ships alongside the code.
→ read the code and re-run it
github.com/v-code01/batchscale