Skip to main content
← Lab

batchscale

null resultPython · llama.cppInference & servingJuly 5, 2026

the question

Does a real llama-server's throughput scale smoothly with concurrency?

what came out

No -- it's non-monotone with a regime change. Throughput plateaus ~220 tok/s through concurrency 8, then jumps to 522 at 16. Concurrency 8, a partial batch, is the worst place to operate: mediocre throughput and the highest latency.

method & receipts

  • Result: null result — an honest negative, reported as it came out.
  • Reproducible one script re-runs the whole thing from scratch.
  • Machine-readable claims every reported number, in a checkable file.
  • Tested — a correctness/benchmark suite ships alongside the code.

→ read the code and re-run it

github.com/v-code01/batchscale